Republic Act No. An act establishing a code of conduct and ethical standards for public officials and employees, to uphold the time-honored principle of. Republic Act No. Rules implementing the code of conduct and ethical standards for public officials and employees. Items 21 – 40 REPUBLIC ACT NO. AN ACT ESTABLISHING A CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND.
|Published (Last):||23 December 2008|
|PDF File Size:||18.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.30 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Petitioner insists that the word recommend be given its literal meaning, that is, that the Ombudsmans action is only advisory in nature rather republic act no 6713 one having any binding effect, citing Tapiador v.
Press esc, or click the close the button to close this dialog box. Download adobe Acrobat or click here nl download the PDF file.
It is mandatory within the bounds of the law. We note that the proviso above qualifies the order to remove, suspend, demote, fine, censure, or prosecute an officer or employee akin to the reupblic issuances in the case at bar. Hence, it cannot be cited as a doctrinal declaration of this Court nor is it safe from judicial examination. All public officials and employees shall, within fifteen 15 working days from receipt thereof, respond to letters, telegrams or other means of communications sent by the public.
republic act no 6713
Skip to Main Content Sitemap. In the recent case republic act no 6713 Ledesma v. We draw attention to subparagraph 3, to wit: The reply must contain the action taken on the request Emphasis supplied. Subject to reasonable conditions prescribed by law, the State adopts and implements a policy of full public disclosure of all its transactions involving public interest.
Republic Act No. 6713
It has long been settled that the power of the Ombudsman to investigate and prosecute any illegal act or omission of any public official is not an exclusive authority but a shared or concurrent authority in respect of republic act no 6713 offense charged. Statement page that will show the available accessibility keys.
This should not be interpreted as usurpation by the Ombudsman of the authority of the head of office or any officer concerned. Shortcut for feedback page. Shortcut Keys Combination Activation Combination keys used for each browser. Checkmail Regional Offices Website. An republic act no 6713 establishing a code of conduct and ethical standards for public officials and employees, to uphold the time-honored principle of public office being a public trust, granting incentives and rewards for exemplary service, enumerating prohibited acts and transactions and providing penalties for violations thereof and for other purposes.
Acuaby Decision of May 28, republic act no 6713, found respondents guilty of violation of Section 5 a of R. The proper interpretation of the Courts republic act no 6713 in Tapiador should be that the Ombudsman has the authority to determine the administrative liability of a public official or employee at fault, and direct and compel the head of the office or agency concerned to implement the penalty imposed.
Accessibility key for redirecting to homepage. Shortcut for viewing the content section of the current page.
Republic Act No. |
The factual antecedents of the case are as follows: Article XI, Section 13 of the Constitution  grants petitioner administrative disciplinary power to. Whether or not the Office of the Ombudsman has the authority to impose administrative sanctions over public officials; and. The Office of the Ombudsman hereafter petitioner argues that the Constitution and R.
That the refusal, without just cause, of any officer to comply with such an order of the Ombudsman to penalize an erring officer republic act no 6713 employee is a ground for disciplinary action, is a strong indication republic act no 6713 the Ombudsmans recommendation is not merely advisory in nature but is actually mandatory within the bounds of law.
Several reasons militate against a literal interpretation of the subject constitutional provision. Duties of Public Officials and Employees.
In fine, petitioners authority to impose republic act no 6713 penalty and enforce compliance therewith is not merely recommendatory. Thus Republic act no 6713 Calderons order disposed: Let the records of the case be remanded to the office of origin, Office of the Ombudsman, for appropriate action consistent with the ruling in this case. In the performance of their duties, all public officials and employees are under obligation to: Shortcut for contact page or form inquiries.
Court of Appeals this Court, resolving in the negative the issue of whether the recommendation of the Ombudsman for the suspension of the therein petitioner, who was found administratively liable in connection with the extension of Temporary Resident Visas of two foreign nationals, was merely advisory on the Bureau of Immigration and Deportation where petitioner was the Chairman of the First Division of its Board of Special Inquiry, held: As a general rule, when a request or petition, whether written or verbal, can be disposed of promptly and expeditiously, the official or employee in charge to whom the same is presented shall do so immediately, without discrimination, and in no case beyond fifteen 15 working days from receipt of the request or petition.
Providedthat the refusal by an officer without just cause to comply with an order of the Ombudsman to remove, suspend, demote, fine, censure, or prosecute an officer or employee who is at fault or who neglects to perform an republic act no 6713 or discharge a duty required by law shall be a ground for disciplinary action against said officer.
Shortcut for FAQ cat. Providedthat the refusal by an officer without just cause to comply with an order republic act no 6713 the Ombudsman to remove, suspend, demote, fine, censure, or prosecute an officer or employee who is at fault or who neglects to perform an act or discharge a duty required by law shall be a ground republic act no 6713 disciplinary action against said officer; Emphasis supplied.
The implementation of the order imposing the penalty is, however, to be coursed through the proper officer. Search for Outstanding Volunte What is the nature of the functions of the Ombudsman as envisioned repulic the Fundamental Law, .
The Office of the Ombudsman shall have disciplinary authority over all elective and appointive officials of the Government and its republic act no 6713, instrumentalities and agencies, including Members of the Cabinet, local government, government-owned or controlled corporations and their subsidiaries, except over officials who republic act no 6713 be removed only by impeachment or over Members of Congress, and the Judiciary.
The provisions of RA support public respondents theory. Section 15 is substantially the same as Section 13, Article XI of the Constitution which provides ni the powers, functions and duties of the Ombudsman.
Firstly, a cursory reading of Tapiador reveals that the main point of the case was the failure of the complainant therein to present substantial evidence to prove the charges of the administrative case. By stating therefore that the Ombudsman recommends the action to be taken against an erring officer or employee, the provisions in the Constitution and in RA intended that the implementation of the order be coursed through the proper officer, which in this case would be the head of the BID.
The statement that made reference to the power of the Ombudsman is, at best, merely an obiter dictum and, as it is unsupported by sufficient explanation, is susceptible to varying interpretations, as what precisely is before us in this case.